Flag the post...let the record show that we are the first to to advocate the electoral defeat Democratic Senator-elect Jim Webb in 2012. We've already read puff-pieces in the MSM and the blogosphere suggesting that Mr. Webb "won't be so bad," noting his support for gun rights and past military experience, both as a Marine officer in Vietnam, and later, as Navy Secretary in the Reagan Administration.
But if you really want to know where Jim Webb stands on the critical issues of the day, look no further than yesterday's "victory" speech in Arlington. Speaking shortly after incumbent George Allen graciously conceded--without requesting a recount--Webb promised to restore "responsibility" to U.S. foreign policy and advocated a "new approach" in Iraq that will lead to a diplomatic solution.
And, if that weren't enough, the millionaire lawyer and novelist took another page out of the DNC talking points, pledging to "work hard on issues of economic fairness in a country that has been too divided by class." He even announced plans to have lunch with George Allen, and discuss how they can help stop the "politics of divisiveness, character assassination and distraction."
Rather odd that Mr. Webb now prefers the political high road after waging one of the most vicious Senate campaigns in recent history. Admittedly, his opponent gave him an opening (the infamous Macaca gaffe), but it was the Webb campaign that resurrected charges that Allen has used the "n" word as a college football quarterback more than 30 years ago. Never mind that the accusation came from a former player who is now a Democratic activist--and the charges were refuted by Allen's other teammates--the baseless "n" word accusation was enough to unfairly brand George Allen as a racist. By comparison, Allen's attack on erotic passages from Webb's novels was almost tame, even quaint. Despite his status as a political novice, Mr. Webb proved quite adept at the politics of personal destruction, a practice he now apparently abhors.
As for his economic plan, "economic fairness" is nothing more than Democratic code words for income redistribution. Given his apparent interest in leveling the economic playing field, we can apparently count on Mr. Webb to support an increase in the minimum wage (despite ample evidence that such hikes actually reduce jobs) and higher taxes for anyone above the middle class. Hope you enjoyed the Bush tax cuts, and the prosperity they produced. If Jim Webb has his way, you'll soon be sending more of your paycheck to Uncle Sam, in the name of "fairness."
But my greatest concern is Mr. Webb's vision for Iraq. Who does he propose that we negotiate with? "Mookie" Sadr's Shiite militia? Al-Qaida in Iraq? Other terrorist organizations? Iran and Syria? All of the above? In Webb's sophisticated world view, you can supposedly negotiate with almost anyone, and extricate the U.S. from a difficult position. But apparently, the Senator-elect never learned one of the cardinal rules of geopolitics: you can only negotiate with terrorists from a position of strength, preferably with the barrel of your gun against the side of their head. Trying to negotiate a quick way out of Iraq now--which appears to be the Webb approach--is an invitation to disaster. However, even the Bush Administration seems to be leaning in that direction, so at least the sell-out of Iraq (and the bloodbath that will inevitably follow) will be a bi-partisan affair.
Judging from Webb's rhetoric, it would also seem that "responsbility" in foreign policy is a fairly new invention, something required only after George W. Bush moved into the White House. Someone ought to ask the Senator-elect about his new party's systematic "irresponsibility" in foreign affairs during the 1990s. Perhaps if his good friend Bill Clinton hadn't taken a pass on the global issues of the day--namely the rise of Islamofacism--there wouldn't be such a need for a "new approach" right now.
The MSM is already fawning over Jim Webb as one of the leading lights of the "new" Senate, but I'll crawl out on the limb and predict that he'll be a disappointment in that chamber, if not a disaster. Fact is, the Marine hero from Vietnam (where he earned the Navy Cross) long ago morphed into a Washington elitist, with little appreciation for the lives of ordinary Americans. This sterling quality is best illustrated by a pre-election anecdote from the Newport News (VA) Daily Press. Heading into a "meet-and-greet" event at Hampton University, one of the nation's oldest predominately black universities, Webb turned to an aide and said "what will I say to those people?" Those people, indeed. The paper dismissed the remark as evidence of Webb's inexperience at retail politics--and that may be a valid interpretation. But I'd say it also smacks of a man who's more at ease in the salons of Georgetown than in the neighborhoods of Norfolk or Isle of Wright County.
Please note that I am not calling Mr. Webb a racist. He is a man of great accomplishment, who served his country with distinction in Vietnam. I have admiration for his skills as a writer; Mr. Webb's first book, Fields of Fire, remains the definitive novel of the Vietnam War. But somewhere between his exit from the Reagan Administration and Election Day 2006, Mr. Webb became a Democratic Party hack, eager to embrace ideas and policies that won't play well in Virginia. We'll see just how "independent" he is when Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi push for that hike in the minimum wage, or a mandatory troop withdrawal from Iraq. Sooner, rather than later, voters in the Old Dominion will discover that they made a mistake on election day, and hope that Mr. Webb becomes "one term Jim."
One more thought: I caught a bit of Pat Buchanan on Hardball last night, although watching anything with Chris Matthews strains my patience. While praising Webb's abilities, Buchanan described him as a "curmudgeon" (Mr. Pot, meet Mr. Kettle) and someone who can be difficult to get along with. That ought to play well in the Senate, where deal-making and back-scratching are the name of the game.
"One term Jim" has been judged by Virginians to be superior to "one term George". The mystery is how George Allen was ever thought of as a leading Republican nominee for President. The man may have run the worst campaign in the history of the Senate.
BOOK CRITICAL OF AFRICAN AMERICANS WHO USE THE N-WORD
Los Angeles, CA., Author H. Lewis Smith has written a thought provoking, culturally divided book that will not only spark heated conversation, but can also bring about real change. The N-word is often used in the African American community amongst each other and is generally not a problem when spoken by another African American. However, once the word is used by a Caucasian person, it brings on other effects. The question is "who can use the word and why?" Smith believes it is a word that should be BURIED!!!!
The book is written in a manner that all can understand. The points are well-taken and the wording is easy to follow. There are quotes from great people in our history including Martin Luther King, Jr., Harriet Tubman, James Baldwin and many, many others. Smith has mixed history with honesty, love with life, education with effects. This is a great book for educators, parents, managers, professionals, newsmen, and anyone else wanting an in-depth look at the N-word, the effects and the solutions. A MUST READ!!!!
H. Lewis Smith has studied the idioms, meanings and the psychological impact of words, its energy and vibratory effects on the human mind for more than two decades. He has been a guest on several talk shows, The Power, The Exchange, Andrea Williams’ Jamin 98.3 and many more. To learn more about Bury that Sucka, please visit http://www.burythatsucka.com
H. Lewis Smith
Let me just say that I find your postings very informative. I think I linked to you from BlackFive a while back and have been reading you for a few weeks. Very good stuff - keep it up.
Oh, Boy! burgeoning author H. Lewis Smith has been on the...(drum roll, please!)...RAY-DI-O!
WOW! I am sooooo impressed! FM 98.3!
When will wanna-be authors learn that adverts in blog comments tend to p*ss people off, rather than get them recognized?
I am a Veteran of two tours in Vietnam who retired after 36 years in the Defense Industrial Complex working on many of the weapons our boys use today.
If you are interested in a view of the inside of the Pentagon procurement process from Vietnam to Iraq please check this morning's posting at my blog:
The issues facing us today are much larger than Rumsfeld's departure.
The Pentagon is a giant,incredibly complex establishment,budgeted in excess of $500B per year. The Rumsfelds, the Adminisitrations and the Congresses come and go but the real machinery of policy and procurement keeps on grinding away, presenting the politicos who arrive with detail and alternatives slanted to perpetuate the machine.
How can any newcomer, be he a President, a Congressman or even the Sec. Def. to be - Mr. Gates- understand such complexity, particulary if heretofore he has not had the clearance to get the full details. Answer- he can't. Therefor he accepts the alternatives provided by the career establishment that never goes away and he hopes he makes the right choices. Or he is influenced by a lobbyist or two representing companies in his district or special interest groups.
From a practical standpoint, policy and war decisions are made far below the levels of the talking heads who take the heat or the credit for the results.
This situation is unfortunate but it is ablsolute fact. Take it from one who has been to war and worked in the establishment.
This giant policy making and war machine will eventually come apart and have to be put back together to operate smaller, leaner and on less fuel. But that won't happen unitil it hits a brick wall at high speed.
We will then have to run a Volkswagon instead of a Caddy and get along somehow. We better start practicing now and get off our high horse. Our golden aura in the world is beginning to dull from arrogance.
Post a Comment