Toward the end of last night's speech on Iraq, President Bush outlined preliminary steps for dealing with Iran and Syria, to interrupt their support for terrorists. He promised to interdict the flow of support from both countries, and destroy the terrorist networks they sponsor inside Iraq.
Mr. Bush also proposed new security initiatives to protect U.S. interests in the Middle East, including the recently-announced deployment of a second carrier battle group to the region. Then, he dropped this minor bombshell, which has been all-but-ignored by the pundits and the MSM:
"We will expand intelligence sharing, and deploy Patriot air defense systems to reassure our friends and allies. We will work with the governments of Turkey and Iraq to help them resolve problems along their border. And we will work with others to prevent Iran from gaining nuclear weapons and dominating the region."
True, Patriot batteries can provide an important symbol of our willingness to protect our friends. But they're most useful in defending key facilities and population centers from air and ballistic missile attacks. It doesn't take a military analyst to understand that there's something larger at work here. The U.S. seems concerned that our military build-up--or a preemptive Israeli strike--could trigger a backlash from Iran, prompting missile attacks against our allies in the region (air strikes are a much lesser threat, given the limited capabilities of the Iranian Air Force). Deploying Patriot batterys now would illustrate U.S. resolve, while providing a missile defense capability in areas that are currently unprotected.
And that begs another important question, namely the beddown location for those Patriot batteries. Saudi Arabia, Israel and Kuwait already operate the system (among others). Additional deployments to those nations would provide redundant coverage. I'm guessing that the deployments announced last night will cover Iraq and the various Gulf States--Bahrain, Qatar, Oman and the United Arab Emirates (UAE)--that currently lack a land-based, missile defense capability. Turkey is another possibility, although our resources are not unlimited; there are only 9 Patriot battalions in the U.S. Army, which includes those currently deployed.
It's also worth noting that countries which may "host" a Patriot deployment also have military facilities that could be used in a military campaign against Iran. Bahrain is already home for the U.S. 5th Fleet; Oman and the UAE have airfields that would be extremely useful in defending the region against Tehran's military forces, or if necessary, launching attacks on Iran. The planned Patriot deployments are not an indicator of pending action against Tehran; however, they do insert an important military asset into the region, and provide a defensive capability that may be useful--even imperative--at some point in the future.
I thought the Patriot reference was really interesting, as was the Turkish border reference. Was he talking about the Turkey/Iraq border...or other Turkish borders with other difficult neighbors.
Taken together with all that business about cutting off networks supplying our enemies, I wonder if the Iranians were being told that things on their side of the line might start covertly blowing up if they don't behave.
The big hammers in reserve -- carrier battle groups, are certainly pretty explicit; but some deniable hammers would seem to be going into place as well.
"deploy Patriot air defense systems to reassure our friends and allies"
I was begining to think I was crazy and was somehow the only one that heard and then read that very phrase. I think when we look back that one line will be the most important of all said by far.
And did you see Condi & Goss dam near call Iran out this morning then announce a 92k increase in army/marine size? 92k increase in the military that is planning to redeploy back home and reconstitute? Righttt perfect sence hmmm
Hope they get a battery here in Bahrain soon.
Iran's biggest threat is its Ballistic Missile Fleet and would give a J-3 his biggest planning headache.
Iran fired hundreds of rockets at Iraq during the 80's War - this was called "The War of the Cities" - and was quite effective at reducing Iraqi Morale.
Their new systems are much more accurate. A Time-On-Target strike from multiple launchers would be very devastating for critical facilities such as Desalinization, Ports, and Oil Loading facilities.
The Patriot system would be the next to the last layer of a system defense that would begin with Airborne Lasers, Aegis SM-3, F22 EW, Patriot, and then the ground-based Phalanx.
Patriots are not deployed operationally unless there is a known threat OR a plan is in effect.
The port in Kuwait City is THE high-value target for enemy missile attack in military operations against Iran. Its loss or contamination by WMD to the point of unuseability would cripple our operations in Iraq and the north side of the Persian Gulf.
Post a Comment