tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10820485.post117216000144928908..comments2023-11-03T09:36:22.100-04:00Comments on In From the Cold: Excuse Me, Mr. Fitzgerald...George Smileyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07049707648660651119noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10820485.post-1172172307201200022007-02-22T14:25:00.000-05:002007-02-22T14:25:00.000-05:00I can't recite the editorial chapter and verse, bu...I can't recite the editorial chapter and verse, but I believe they expressed the same "outrage" at the NYT.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12712369389411084085noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10820485.post-1172170192156310382007-02-22T13:49:00.000-05:002007-02-22T13:49:00.000-05:00Yeah, this one's a real travesty. It's disgusting...Yeah, this one's a real travesty. It's disgusting, actually. Not only were the agents outed, but so was the air carrier. While the Times didn't publish their real names, they sure published a great deal of information on their personal lives (along with their aliases) that I'm guessing can easily be traced back to these agents. I wonder how long it takes before their identities are either leaked or uncovered.<BR/><BR/>Seems to be a double-standard here. huh? I tried to find the LA Times' position on the Plame case way-back-when, but have had no luck. Did they editorialize on it? I'd love to see the hypocrisy...Angevin13https://www.blogger.com/profile/00645571669987524664noreply@blogger.com