tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10820485.post8689952565250420915..comments2023-11-03T09:36:22.100-04:00Comments on In From the Cold: WMDs in America?George Smileyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07049707648660651119noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10820485.post-67651309042563110712011-02-17T13:17:36.544-05:002011-02-17T13:17:36.544-05:00Today the UT tries to revise the "story"...Today the UT tries to revise the "story" ...<br /><br />http://tinyurl.com/49294cg<br /><br />If it smells like $hit ... Just say'nsalesjerkhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16242606409947114294noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10820485.post-13169391754135168022011-02-16T22:23:03.288-05:002011-02-16T22:23:03.288-05:00The female "Assistant Public Affairs Officer&...The female "Assistant Public Affairs Officer" who interrupts (and answers for) Hallor in the video has not been identified, yet she seems to possess censorship over Hallor. Is she in reality a USCG officer assigned by DHS? That is my tentative guess.<br /><br />The press has certainly not been thorough in its coverage. It seems extremely unusual for a public relations official not to be identified by full name, because their authority is conveyed both by their title and non-anonymity <br /><br />This is certainly a very suspicious development, and was perhaps manufactured and approved by Napolitano to arouse the public as a thought- experiment in advance of replacing in April the color-coded Threat Level System with an undefined system designed to better convey threats locally.<br /><br />I must also note that while the short definition of WMD has not specifically included "psychological and/or economic damage to the United States", the newer term (circa 2001-2005) WME does.Vigilishttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05051789616490005367noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10820485.post-32679256854458125732011-02-16T06:41:41.687-05:002011-02-16T06:41:41.687-05:00I think the key phrase in both statements was:
CB...I think the key phrase in both statements was:<br /><br /><i>CBP has not specifically had any incidents with nuclear devices or nuclear materials at our ports of entry.</i><br /><br />Note "<b>at our ports of entry</b>."<br /><br /><b>Not</b> a categorical "nuclear devices or nuclear materials have not been found."<br /><br />If you reread Hallor's statement, it seems clear that some type of nuclear device or nuclear material-based WMD <b>was</b> found in San Diego, just not at the port (perhaps after it had already passed through the port and on to another location, or having entered by other means, such as over our all too porous border with Mexico; those drug tunnels can be used to smuggle in a lot more than drugs, and I'm sure Al Qaeda would pay the Mexican drug lords just about anything they asked.)Billhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02523783177950284694noreply@blogger.com